Based
on Matthew 13:24-30, 36-43
A
revision of a message first delivered July 23, 2017
Rev.
Dr. Kevin Orr
When I was young, I was introduced
to the writings of C.S. Lewis. That is, the books he wrote other than the
Chronicles of Narnia, his masterful fantasy novels that I devoured as a child.
Someone suggested to me that I read Mere Christianity. This book is a
collection of lectures that Lewis gave in which he attempted to argue for the
rationality of being a believer in Jesus Christ. Lewis was such a rational
thinker and a great debater. He constructed so many arguments that proved that
Jesus was the Christ, the Son of God, that when I finished the book I thought
to myself, “If a person doesn’t believe in Jesus after reading this book,
they’re an idiot.” Not exactly the most charitable thought. And, of course, I
already believed in Jesus so it’s not as if Lewis had to convince me of
anything. But I was impressed with his arguments and it really did baffle me
why not everyone believed in God and in Jesus Christ, God’s son. Surely if
people would hear the gospel the way Lewis explained it they would come to
belief. It seemed so obvious to me. Why didn’t others get it?
This was a similar question that the
early followers of Jesus had. I mean, here was Jesus, teaching the truth like
nobody’s business. And not only did he teach with such authority, but he backed
it up by the way he demonstrated a good, moral life. And not only that, he
could heal people, cast out demons, and work all kinds of miracles. To those
who were following Jesus, it was so obvious to them that he must be the
messiah. The evidence was overwhelming. And yet, there were many who did not
believe. How can this be? And worse of all, those who should have believed were
not only not believing in Jesus but were accusing him of being a false
messiah. The religious leaders, the scribes, the Pharisees, they were not
buying in to Jesus and his message. His miracles and works of healing did not
impress them. And it left the disciples scratching their heads a little bit.
How is it that these religious leaders, who should have known better, were not
getting it?
Well, Jesus had an answer for his
followers. And like Jesus tended to do, he gave his answer by telling a
parable. He told a story using experiences of daily life that, when properly
interpreted, gave a special insight or lifted up some important questions to
mull over. Basically, as it seems to me, Jesus was telling his disciples that
the reason why some believed in Jesus and others didn’t is because the evil one
was messing things up. The weeds, which symbolize the children of the evil one,
are from the seed the evil one planted in the cover of darkness when no one was
looking. So those who don’t believe are like the weeds, the children of the
evil one. But, importantly, the evil one is responsible, not the children of
the evil one. It is the evil one that planted the seeds. The children of the
evil one, the weeds, the unbelievers, they are simply being who they are. In a way,
they can’t help it. They can only be pitied.
Now at the same time, those who are
the believers, the children of the righteous, are such because of Jesus. The
Son of Man, Jesus, is the one who planted the seeds of wheat, which the
believers are. It’s not that they had done anything special. They had the good
fortune of being the children of righteousness. They were lucky enough to be
wheat instead of weeds. It seems what Jesus is saying in this parable is rather
than puzzle over why people don’t believe in Jesus, acknowledge that they just
can’t help it. They are being who they are, weeds, children of the evil one.
The disciples, the believers, are being who they are, wheat, children of
righteousness. So be grateful you are wheat and don’t stress about the weeds.
If anything, have pity for the weeds. Let them be weeds. You be wheat.
I don’t know how you feel about this
interpretation of Jesus’ parable. I think I’m communicating the gist of what
Jesus is saying. But it leaves me feeling a bit uneasy, as parables should. The
parable does give an explanation of why some people believe in Jesus and others
don’t. But it also feels a bit fatalist to me. For those of theological mind,
it comes across as a bit Calvinist. I believe in Jesus because I was fated to believe
in Jesus. I’m one of the chosen ones. Joe over here is an unbeliever because he
was fated to be an unbeliever. He is not one of the chosen ones. So, be
grateful you aren’t Joe because you won’t experience his fate, to be thrown
into the fiery furnace at the day of judgment. My Arminian, Wesleyan, free will
theology is screaming out, “That’s not how this works!” Jesus shed his blood
for everyone. It is God’s desire that everyone be saved. Those who reject Jesus
were not fated to reject Jesus. Each person is free to make their own
choice whether or not to be a follower of Jesus. Besides that, the image of
nonbelievers being thrown into a fiery furnace on judgment day is a difficult
image for me to swallow. It’s one thing if it is Hitler or really bad, evil
people being thrown in the furnace. But the idea that Julie is going to be
thrown into the fires of hell because she didn’t believe in Jesus seems pretty
harsh.
This is why parables are tricky and
we have to be careful with them. The temptation is to use a parable to give an
answer to the wrong question. The question that prompted Jesus sharing this
parable of the wheat and weeds had to do with why people didn’t accept Jesus as
the messiah. The question was not about what will happen to bad people on the
day of judgment. Jesus answers that question later in the famous parable of the
separation of the sheep and the goats, which you can read about in Matthew 25,
another parable that should make us feel a bit uneasy. This parable of the
wheat and weeds is addressing a specific question in a specific context. When
we take this parable and start running with it, which I am about to do, we have
to use some caution and make our interpretations and applications knowing that
they are less than perfect. Like inspired works of art, parables are really
meant to provoke more questions than to give clear cut answers.
That said, what might this parable
suggest to us about how the Jesus followers understood their situation? The
first thing that jumps out at me is there appears to be a sectarian spirit
among them. There are two groups of people, the righteous ones and the evil
ones. Those who are believers, the Jesus followers, are in the righteous group
and everyone else are outside the group and, as a consequence, are the evil
ones. Insiders and outsiders, believers and non-believers.
In those days there were a lot of
sects. People would associate with their own group and look down on or be
suspicious of other groups. We still have that today. We may not consider
ourselves being in a sect and we may not spend a lot of energy running down or
being suspicious of other groups who don’t belong to our group. But we do have
our groups. We belong to our cliques, our circle of friends, our network of
colleagues, our crew.
Here’s another thing to keep in mind
about the days of Matthew. The righteous ones, the insiders, the Jesus
followers, tended to be those who were on the low end of the social status
pole. They were fishermen, shepherds, tax collectors, prostitutes, slaves, widows,
orphans, and other common, ordinary people. The non-believers, particularly the
most belligerent ones, tended to be religious leaders like scribes and
Pharisees. Those with greater status, education and authority were not jumping
on the Jesus train. In fact, they were the loudest critics of Jesus and his
followers.
Now imagine, if you are a good
person among good people, and the authorities look down on you, oppress you,
harass you, and dismiss your messiah as a fraud, then the idea that one day
those evil people of power and authority will face God’s wrath while you and
your community will shine like the sun and be vindicated, that can be an
appealing idea. We all want to believe that at the end of the day, those bad
people are going to get what’s coming to them and the good people who were
right all along will be vindicated.
But there is another thing about
sects, about insider groups, that we need to keep in mind. Sects desire to be
separate from the unrighteous in order to maintain the purity of the insider
group. For example, in the days of Jesus, there was a sect called the Essenes.
They believed themselves to be the only true believers, the children of light.
Everyone else were children of the darkness. The Essenes separated themselves,
fleeing to the desert in order to maintain what they believed to be pure
worship of God. They would stay out in the desert and wait it out until God
sent down fire and destroyed all the evildoers.
We have examples of sects who try to
separate themselves from outsiders these days. Maybe not as dramatic as the
Essenes. Have you heard of a Christian sect called the Hutterites? They are
like ultra-conservative Amish, and that’s saying something. Hutterite
communities are often found in the windswept plains of Alberta and
Saskatchewan. They isolate themselves because they intend to not have any
unbelievers enter their communities.
But for Jesus followers in the days
of Matthew, isolating themselves from the unbelievers was not an option. For
one thing, take believers who are slaves. Separating themselves from their
masters in order to get away from the unbelievers, well…the master may have a
problem with that. Many of the followers of Jesus simply did not have the
ability due to their life situation to just pack up and head into the desert.
They needed to live in the community. There were entanglements that kept most
of the Jesus followers living among the nonbelievers. They were all in it
together. The roots of the wheat and the weeds were entangled. So, until the
day of judgment which the followers of Jesus anticipated, the righteous will
have to live with the unrighteous. In the meantime, the wheat needed to be
wheat. Let the weeds be weeds. God will sort it all out in the end.
Now, how do we apply this parable to
our lives? How might this parable give us insights on who we are and how we are
to relate to those who are not followers of Jesus?
First, let’s be honest. Would any of
us identify ourselves as a weed? I doubt it. I think we all would say we are
the wheat in this parable without having to cross our fingers behind our backs.
However, there are times when we act a bit “weedy.” That’s true for me. My mom
used to say that when milk started to get sour, she said it was tasting
“weedy.” Sometimes we can be a bit sour. If we think of our hearts as a field,
we would find a lot of wheat but also a lot of weeds. We are all a mixed bag of
good and bad. To think as followers of Jesus we are the good ones and
non-believers are the evil baddies, that’s pretty simplistic. We all have some
weeds growing in our hearts.
Second, I suggest we put our energy
into being good wheat rather than waste energy identifying and judging who the
weeds are. I really like this image in the parable of the roots of the wheat
and weeds being entangled. When the slaves asked the householder about whether
they should pull up the weeds or not, the householder, out of concern for the
health of the wheat, told them to leave the weeds alone. He didn’t want to risk
the wheat being harmed in the process of ripping out the weeds. Just so, we are
all entangled in the community in which we live. Judging and trying to separate
and divide the good people from the bad ones does damage to the whole
community. It harms our own well-being. Our role is to be the wheat God intends
for us to be. Let weeds be weeds. Or, like Paul wrote, “work out your own
salvation with fear and trembling.” Another way to say it is to stay in your
own lane.
Last, I ask you to consider where
wheat grows. One time, my family drove across Kansas. If you have ever been to
Kansas, you know what I’m about to say. It is miles and miles of not much. The
highway is straight. Every ten miles or so there is a town. And in every town
there is a grain elevator. In other words, the plains of Kansas are boring.
But, on those boring plains of
Kansas, there is a lot of cattle grazing. You also find a lot of corn,
soybeans, barley, oats, rye, and, of course, wheat. Kansas may be boring, but
it is from Kansas that we get what becomes a loaf of bread, a hot bowl of
oatmeal and a good sirloin steak. There is nothing flashy or interesting about
growing wheat. But wheat and other grains are central to our diet. As the old
saying goes, bread is the staff of life. So, living a righteous life, like
wheat, isn’t always flashy or interesting. But it does provide sustenance so
that society can thrive. For our community to thrive, we have the
responsibility to be the kind of wheat God wants us to be. So, my challenge for
us is to recommit ourselves to be the best wheat we can be, to continue to grow
and flourish as followers of Jesus, so that we can be used of God to nourish
and sustain our world.
No comments:
Post a Comment