Based on Matthew 25:14-30
The parable of the talents is a fascinating story. It is the second of three stories Jesus tells in this section of Matthew that have a focus on the time between when Jesus leaves the earth and when Jesus returns to establish the reign of God on the earth. Last week’s story was the parable of the ten bridesmaids. We considered what it means to be prudent during this long delay of Jesus’ return. We spend our time now getting ready by living righteous lives. The third story in this series, which we will look at next week, is about the final judgment, that well known scene where people are separated like sheep and goats and what you have done for the least of these you have done to Jesus.
This week’s story is on the parable
of the talents in which three servants are given different amounts of money to
manage while the master is away for a long time. Often this story is turned
into an allegory. The master is Jesus. His being gone a long time reflects the
delayed return of Jesus. The servants are disciples. The talents could be
spiritual gifts or skills. It is unclear exactly what the talents are supposed
to represent. At the end of the story, the master, Jesus, returns and holds the
servants, his disciples, to account for what they have done with what the
master has given them. This perhaps symbolizes the final judgement. What the
servants did or did not do is either rewarded or punished. The moral of the
story is that we need to use the gifts and abilities God has given us to serve
God in the world. If we hide those abilities and not serve God with them, we
will lose those abilities and be held accountable. That’s basically how this
story is usually talked about in sermons. This is often a go to passage for Stewardship
Sunday, as you can imagine.
As we look at this story again, I
want to focus on the motivation and actions of the three servants. I believe
this is the heart of this story. I want to set aside what this story may be
trying to say about Jesus and his role as a judge. I also want to get away from
wondering why one of the servants got five talents and why the last servant
only got one talent. We are going to avoid trying to figure out exactly what
the talents are supposed to represent or what trading money in the marketplace
has to do with being a disciple. I want us to instead look at what really
separated the first two servants from the last servant. What separated them was
not the amount of money they were given to manage but what motivated them and
the actions that followed their motivation. If we focus on that, I find this
story has something important to say to us in these times we find ourselves.
The first two servants were
motivated by faithfulness. The master was going away for a long time. He had
confidence in his servants to manage his money while he was gone. He gives them
a lot of money to manage. As you may recall, one talent is equivalent to what a
common day laborer would make over fifteen years. So, five talents are
equivalent to seventy-five years of labor. Most people would never earn five
talents in their whole lives. So that is a substantial amount of money. Two
talents are a lot of money. Even one talent is a significant amount. The first
two servants receive that money and are motivated by faithfulness. They are
motivated to honor the faith that the master has put in them.
Now, notice this. The master does
not give any instructions on what the servants are supposed to do with the
money. He just gives them the money and hits the road. Each servant has to make
a decision about what they will do with the money they have been given. The
first two servants, motivated by their faithfulness, wanting to honor the faith
their master placed in them, take the initiative and follow the example of
their master. See, the reason why their master has all this money in the first
place is because, as we see in verse 24, he reaps where he does not sow and
gathers where he did not scatter seed. In other words, he is an investor. He
provides the capital the farmers need to grow their crops and expects to get
his cut from what they produce. That’s how he grew his wealth. His servants
watched and learned what their master did, how he handles his business. So, the
first two servants take the initiative to do what their master would do. They
put the money to work, exposing it to potential risk, with the goal of doubling
that money. That’s how they honored the faith their master had put in them.
They did what their master would do. Motivated by faithfulness, the servants
took the initiative, took on the potential risk, with the hope that they would
make their master proud, so they could demonstrate to their master that he was
right to put his faith in them.
The third servant, however, was
motivated by fear. He was afraid of what might happen if he put that money to
work and he lost it all. What if he let his master down? What if the faith the
master had put in him was misplaced? He was paralyzed by fear. So, what he
decided to do was to protect that money. He decided to bury it in the ground
where it would be safe. That way, when the master came back, the servant could
give him the money back. Safe and secure. Motivated by fear, fear of the
master, the servant’s fear of his own lack of ability, he took the route of
burying the money for safe keeping. Risk free.
That’s the thing about fear. When we
are motivated by fear, we seek to minimize risk. For anyone who has experience
with investing, especially if you are working with an investment advisor, one
of the first questions asked is about what your risk tolerance is. An
investment advisor might say to you, “OK, you have this money that you are not
going to need for ten years and you want to invest it in the market. With a
range from very aggressive to very conservative, where would you be willing to
place your investments and still be able to sleep at night?” It is a question
about how much risk you are willing to take. If you take on more risk than you
are comfortable with, that gets into fear mode. You would be so afraid that you
won’t sleep well at night. That’s just one example. Fear as a motivation tends
to get us acting in ways that conserve, that circles the wagons, that closes in
and seals off. Motivated by fear, the third servant acted accordingly by avoiding
risk and, frankly, not doing anything except bury the money and then go on with
his life.
Of course, when the master gets back
and finds out what the third servant has done he is furious. It’s not even so
much that the servant didn’t make him any money. I think the master was mostly
disappointed because that servant did not follow his example. All this time the
servant had been watching how the master worked with his money. He watched the
master go about his business. The master gave this servant an opportunity to do
what he did, to follow the example he had set, to take the initiative with the
associated risks. I can imagine that if the third servant had followed his
master’s example and ended up losing all the money, that the master would have
been disappointed but, hey, it goes with the territory. At least the servant
tried. He followed the example of his master. He did the right things. We don’t
control the results, especially when it comes to investing. Fear did this
servant in. The master was not sympathetic.
Were the first two servants fearful?
Were they afraid of what might happen if they lost the money through their
investments? Apparently not. Or at least whatever fear they may have had was
overridden by their gratitude that their master had placed his confidence in
them to do what he would do. They were honored by what the master had entrusted
to them and they wanted to do their master proud by following his example and
doing what he did, in spite of whatever anxiety they were likely feeling. They
were on their own, after all. They had to take the initiative. They had to put
in the work. They had to do the things and take on the risk. But their
faithfulness to their master was the overriding motivation that got them out
there to do what their master taught them to do. If fear motivates us to turn
inward, conserve and protect, faithfulness motivates us to be engaged, get out
there and do what we need to do.
What is your motivation these days?
If you had to choose your main motivation in your day to day living between
faithfulness and fear, which would you choose? Motivational speakers sometimes
get a bad rap. They can be the butt of jokes. Many years ago, on Saturday Night
Live there used to be that bit where the fictional character Stuart Smalley
would give these daily affirmations. He would start his bit looking in the
mirror saying, “I’m good enough, I’m smart enough, and dog gone it, people like
me.” But even though they are being spoofed, the truth is that what motivates
us does matter. Fear is a powerful motivation. But so is love. You are loved.
You are precious to God. God has given you your life. God has faith in you,
that you can live your life after the example that Jesus has set for us. Yes,
it takes initiative. Yes, there is risk. But you can live your life in a way
that honors the faith that God has placed in you. You can live a life that is
faithful to God. Even with the anxiety and stress that you are carrying in
these anxious and stressful times, you can and are being faithful.
I want to encourage you today to
keep at it. Keep striving, every day, to live your life motivated by
faithfulness, faithful to the way of Jesus, confident in God’s faithfulness.
Keep living a faith filled life with confidence that the day will come when you
will hear spoken into your life, “Enter into the joy of your master.”
No comments:
Post a Comment